我们热爱互联网
2011-10-19未分类

没有评论 57 views

Steve Jobs, 1955 – 2011

Steven Paul Jobs, 56, died Wednesday at his home with his family. The co-founder and, until last August, CEO of Apple Inc was the most celebrated person in technology and business on the planet. No one will take issue with the official Apple statement that “The world is immeasurably better because of Steve.”

It had taken a while for the world to realize what an amazing treasure Steve Jobs was. But Jobs knew it all along. That was part of what was so unusual about him. From at least the time he was a teenager, Jobs had a freakish chutzpah. At age 13, he called up the head of HP and cajoled him into giving Jobs free computer chips. It was part of a lifelong pattern of setting and fulfilling astronomical standards.
Throughout his career, he was fearless in his demands. He kicked aside the hoops that everyone else had to negotiate and straightforwardly and brazenly pursued what he wanted. When he got what he wanted — something that occurred with astonishing frequency — he accepted it as his birthright.

If Jobs were not so talented, if he were not so visionary, if he were not so canny in determining where others had failed in producing great products and what was necessary to succeed, his pushiness and imperiousness would have made him a figure of mockery.

But Steve Jobs was that talented, visionary and determined. He combined an innate understanding of technology with an almost supernatural sense of what customers would respond to. His conviction that design should be central to his products not only produced successes in the marketplace but elevated design in general, not just in consumer electronics but everything that aspires to the high end.

As a child of the sixties who was nurtured in Silicon Valley, his career merged the two strains in a way that reimagined business itself. And he did it as if he didn’t give a damn who he pissed off. He could bully underlings and corporate giants with the same contempt. But when he chose to charm, he was almost irresistible. His friend, Heidi Roizen, once gave advice to a fellow Apple employee that the only way to avoid falling prey to the dual attacks of venom and charm at all hours was not to answer the phone. That didn’t work, the employee said, because Jobs lived only a few blocks away. Jobs would bang on the door and not go away.

For most of his 56 years, Steve Jobs banged on doors, but for the past dozen or so very few were closed to him. He was the most adored and admired business executive on the planet, maybe in history. Presidents and rock stars came to see him. His fans waited up all night to gain entry into his famous “Stevenote” speeches at Macworld, almost levitating with anticipation of what Jobs might say. Even his peccadilloes and dark side became heralded.

His accomplishments were unmatched. People who can claim credit for game-changing products — iconic inventions that become embedded in the culture and answers to Jeopardy questions decades later — are few and far between. But Jobs has had not one, not two, but six of these breakthroughs, any one of which would have made for a magnificent career. In order: the Apple II, the Macintosh, the movie studio Pixar, the iPod, the iPhone and the iPad. (This doesn’t even include the consistent, brilliant improvements to the Macintosh operating system, or the Apple retail store juggernaut.) Had he lived a natural lifespan, there would have almost certainly been more.

Behind any human being is a mystery: What happened to make him … him? When considering extraordinary people, the question becomes an obsession. What produces the sort of people who create world-changing products, inspire by example and shock by justified audacity, and tag billions of minds with memetic graffiti? What led to his dead-on product sense, his haughty confidence, his ability to simultaneously hector and inspire people to do their best work?

His gene pool was intriguing. His biological parents were Abdulfattah John Jandali, a Syrian immigrant; and a graduate student named Joanne Simpson. Unmarried when her son was born on February 24, 1955, Simpson gave him up for adoption. She later married Jandali and had another child, award-winning novelist Mona Simpson. Jobs grew up in a middle-class suburb with two loving parents, Paul and Clara Jobs. (He had a sister, Patti, who survives him.) Though he did make a successful effort to find his birth mother, he never seemed to warm to the theory that his drive was a subconscious reaction to a conjectured rejection. He always spoke highly of the family that raised him. “I grew up at a time where we were all well-educated in public schools, a time of peace and stability until the Vietnam War got going in the late sixties,” he said.

The turmoil in those sixties was also part of his make-up. “We wanted to more richly experience why were we were alive,” he said of his generation, “not just make a better life, and so people went in search of things. The great thing that came from those that time was to realize that there was definitely more to life than the materialism of the late 50’s and early sixties. We were going in search of something deeper.”

He went to Reed, a well-regarded liberal arts school known as a hippie haven, but dropped out after a semester, choosing to audit courses informally. (Including a class on calligraphy that would come in very handy in later years.) Jobs also took LSD in those years, and would claim that those experiences affected his outlook permanently and positively. After leaving Oregon, he traveled to India. All of these experiences had an effect on the way he saw the world — and the way he would make products to change that world.

Jobs usually had little interest in public self-analysis, but every so often he’d drop a clue to what made him tick. Once he recalled for me some of the long summers of his youth. I’m a big believer in boredom,” he told me. Boredom allows one to indulge in curiosity, he explained, and “out of curiosity comes everything.” The man who popularized personal computers and smartphones — machines that would draw our attention like a flame attracts gnats — worried about the future of boredom. “All the [technology] stuff is wonderful, but having nothing to do can be wonderful, too.”

In an interview with a Smithsonian oral history project in 1995, Jobs talked about how he learned to read before he got to school — that and chasing butterflies was his passion. School was a shock to him — “I encountered authority of a different kind than I had ever encountered before, and I did not like it,” he said. By his own account he became a troublemaker. Only the ministrations of a wise fourth grade teacher — who lured him back to learning with bribes and then hooked him with fascinating projects — rekindled his love of learning.

Meanwhile, his dad, Paul — a machinist who had never completed high school — had set aside a section of his workbench for Steve, and taught him how to build things, disassemble them, and put them together. From neighbors who worked in the electronics firm in the Valley, he learned about that field — and also understood that things like television sets were not magical things that just showed up in one’s house, but designed objects that human beings had painstakingly created. “It gave a tremendous sense of self-confidence, that through exploration and learning one could understand seemingly very complex things in one’s environment,” he told the Smithsonian interviewer.

After his call to Packard, Jobs worked at HP as a teenager. He later had a job at Atari, when the video-game company was just getting started. Yet he did not see the field as something that would satisfy his artistic urges. “Electronics was something I could always fall back on when I needed food on the table,” he once told me.

That changed when Steve Jobs saw what a high-school friend, Steve Wozniak, was doing. Wozniak was a member of the Homebrew Computer Club, a collection of Valley engineers and hangers-on who were thrilled at the prospect of personal computers, which had just become possible with the advent of low-cost chips and electronics. “Woz” was among several of the group who designing their own, but he had no desire to commercialize his project, even though it was groundbreaking in simplicity and also was one of the first to include color graphics.

When Jobs saw his friend’s project, he wanted to make a business. While other home-brewers were also starting companies, Jobs was unique in understanding that personal computers could appeal to an audience far beyond geeks.

“If you view computer designers as artists, they’re really into more of an art form that can be mass-produced, like records, or like prints, than they are into fine arts,” he told me in 1983. “They want something where they can express themselves to a large number of people through their medium, and their medium is technology and manufacturing.” Later he would refine this point of view by talking about Apple as a blend of engineering and liberal arts.

The most visible manifestation of this was the elegant case that housed the Apple II. Jobs paid a fledgling industrial designer named Jerry Manock $1,500 to design a plastic case with an earthy beige. (Manock wanted to be paid in advance because, he told author Michael Moritz, “They were flaky-looking customers and I didn’t know if they were going to be around when the case was finished.” Jobs talked him into waiting for his payment.)

“He told me about the prices he was getting for parts, and they were favorable to the prices HP was paying,” his friend Allen Baum said. Jobs would make these deals while Woz and a small team of teenage engineers worked in the Jobs family garage. Every so often Jobs would drop by and impose his views on the project. “He would pass judgment, which is his major talent, over the keyboards, the case design, the logo, what parts to buy, how to lay out the PC board so it would look nice, the arrangement of parts, the deals we chose … everything,” said Chris Espinosa, one of the original group. One other thing Jobs did was convince Wozniak to quit his job at HP and work full time for Apple. When Woz originally demurred, Jobs called all of Woz’s friends and relatives, putting so much pressure on that the gentle engineer capitulated. Once again, Jobs had gotten what he wanted.

Jobs gave thought to what kind of company he wanted Apple to be — once he told me his wish was to create “a $10 billion company that didn’t lose its soul.” He would call up the premier CEOs of Silicon Valley — Andy Grove, Jerry Sanders — and ask them if they would take him out to lunch so he could pick their brains. He later realized that he and Woz were an object of curiosity to people because they were so young. “But we didn’t think of ourselves as young guys,” he said. “We didn’t have a lot of time to philosophize,” he told me. “We were working 18 hours a day, seven days a week — having fun.”

The Apple II was a hit, and so was the company. But unlike Bill Gates, who founded Microsoft in the same period, Jobs did not run Apple. Realizing that his company might go farther if run by professional management, and not a barefoot 22-year-old with a Fidel beard and an abrasive personality, Apple hired a chief executive for adult supervision. Over the next few years, Apple became the most popular of the small field of personal computers, and on Dec. 12, 1980, Apple held an IPO. It was highly unusual for a company that young to do so, but it turned out to be the biggest holding that mantle until IBM entered the field in late 1981.

As Apple became a larger business, Job was somewhat adrift. “The question was, ‘How do I go about influencing Apple?’” he explained in 1983. “Well, I can run around telling people things all day, but that’s not going to result in what I really want. So I thought a really good way to influence Apple would be by example — to be a general manager here at Apple.”

In 1979, as part of the efforts to develop a more advanced machine called the Lisa, Jobs led a team of engineers on an excursion to Xerox PARC. He later described it as “an apocalypse.” He immediately declared that the principles of the Xerox Star — mouse-driven navigations, windows, files and folders on the screen — be integrated into Lisa, an effort which jacked up the cost of the machine almost five-fold. But Jobs’ management style consistently offended the Lisa team, and he looked elsewhere in the company for a group to lead. He found what he was looking for in a skunkworks project off the campus led by a talented computer scientist named Jef Raskin. The small team was working on a low-cost computer to be called Macintosh. “When Steve started coming over, Jef’s dream was shattered on the spot,” said Mac team member Joanna Hoffman.

The Macintosh was a turning point for Jobs, who worried about being branded as the guy who founded Apple, but not much more. Jobs was a relentless, even punishing leader. But his passion earned him the loyalty of the small young team. He encouraged them to think of themselves as rebels. “It’s better to be pirates than to join the Navy,” he told them. A skull and bones flag flew on their office building.

While the Lisa was inspired by the Xerox’s “graphical user interface,” Macintosh took it a step farther. It worked with even more simplicity, was faster, and had a distinctive shape — inspired by the Cuisinart food processor, an appliance Jobs admired. When I interviewed Jobs about the Macintosh in November 1983, he explained to me that while the Lisa team wanted to make something great, “the Mac people want to do something insanely great.”

During that interview I asked Jobs for an explanation on why he sometimes gave harsh, even rude assessments of his employee’s work. (Though in some respects Jobs became more mellow later in life, such blunt criticism became a trademark.) “We have an environment where excellence is really expected,” he said. “What’s really great is to be open when [the work] is not great. My best contribution is not settling for anything but really good stuff, in all the details. That’s my job — to make sure everything is great.” Even though Jobs made life hell at times for the brilliant young engineers of the Mac team, they generally regard the experience as the highlight of their professional careers, a magic moment. And indeed, the Macintosh experience provided a template for the culture of many startups, down to the lavish perks provided to the workers.

On Jan. 24, 1984, Jobs publicly unveiled the Macintosh. A night earlier, a stunning, cinematic Super Bowl ad for the computer galvanized the nation; many consider it the greatest commercial in history. The Mac was a sensation. It also cemented Jobs as a national figure, featured with major features in Newsweekand Rolling Stone. (Though he was disappointed that Rolling Stone did not put him on the cover. Jobs actually called publisher Jann Wenner to plead his case. Wenner told him, “Don’t hold your breath.” lI said ‘All right, but you ought to think about this more,’l Jobs futilely recounted. Later, Jobs’ demands for magazine covers would be eagerly accommodated.)

The Macintosh was arguably the most important personal computer in history. It introduced a style of computing that persisted for decades (sadly for Apple, most people experienced the graphical user interface via Microsoft Windows computers, not Macintosh.) It made computers sexy.

But the Mac did not initially sell as well as expected. This failure, as well as Jobs’ managerial shortcomings, put Jobs in jeopardy at the company he founded. For several weeks, he conducted a backroom battle with John Sculley, the former CEO of Pepsi he had personally recruited to run Apple in 1983. (Jobs had famously challenged Sculley by asking, “Do you really want to sell sugar water for the rest of your life?”) But Sculley outmaneuvered Jobs by winning the backing of the board. And on May 31, 1985, he fired Steve Jobs.

The ouster was cathartic for Jobs. “You’ve probably had somebody punch you in the stomach and it knocks the wind of you and you can’t breathe. That’s how I felt,” he told Newsweek. But he regained his breath by starting Next, a company that designed and sold next-generation workstations. The Next computer, a striking jet-black cube, never caught on (though Tim Berners-Lee would write the code for the World Wide Web on it), but its innovative operating system turned out to be of lasting value, and Jobs kept the company going as a software concern.

During those years, Jobs took on a second company besides Next. A struggling computer graphics studio founded by George Lucas was looking for a white knight, and Steve Jobs took the role. It was to be called Pixar. Under Jobs’ guidance, Pixar morphed from a software company into a movie studio. It produced the first full-length computer-animated feature, “Toy Story,” the first of a series of monster hits for the studio.

Running Pixar was a step in Jobs’ growing maturity. He was wise enough to focus on the deal-making and let the creative movie-makers, like director John Lassiter, do their work. He also got valuable experience in Hollywood. Eventually, he sold Pixar to Disney in 2006 for $7.4 billion.

But it was that other company, Next, that brought Jobs back to the company he co-founded. Apple needed a powerful new operating system, and the Next could provide one. Apple bought Next, but its troubles went far deeper. People were writing the company’s corporate obituary. In 1997, the board of directors fired CEO Gil Amelio and turned to one of its founders to revitalize the company. One of the first things he did was forge a deal with Apple’s blood rival, Microsoft.

While Jobs emphatically stated that he was only filling an interim role at Apple — “I hope we can find a terrific CEO tomorrow,” he said that August — he took to it so enthusiastically that it was no surprise that he removed the lowercase “i” from his iCEO title in 2000. By then he had made Apple profitable again.

A turning point was his introduction of the iMac in May 1998. Almost a year after taking control of Apple, Jobs called me and invited me to spend a few days with him as he launched his first big project. I got a glimpse of the exacting preparations he makes for a launch, monitoring every detail. (He nixed the sound of a clarinet on a video soundtrack to a clip because it sounded “too synthetic.”) When an employee showed him some work at one point he said simply, “This is a ‘D,’” and turned away. But at the launch itself, he was the picture of poise.

The iMac was a huge success, an all-in-one machine that sent the message that simplicity, beauty and power would be behind Apple’s comeback. He also simplified Apple’s product line to four computers — consumer and pro versions of desktop and laptop. “Focus does not mean saying yes, it means saying no,” he explained. “I was Dad. And that was hard.”

But with each iteration of computers, Apple was gaining fans. The one exception was Jobs’ introduction of a monitorless machine called the Cube. It was perhaps the most beautiful computer ever. But in this case, Jobs let his aesthetic instincts overwhelm his sense of the marketplace. It was a rare failure.

In 2000, he explained how competitors still didn’t understand Apple’s mix of art and science. “When people look at an iMac, they think the design is really great, but most people don’t understand it’s not skin deep,” he said. “There’s a reason why, after two years, people haven’t been able to copy the iMac. It’s not just surface. The reason the iMac doesn’t have a fan is engineering. It took a ton of engineering and that’s true for the Cube and everything else.”

In October 2001, Apple introduced a music player, the iPod. It broke ground as the first successful pocket-size digital music player. Because Jobs had a tremendous ability to locate and hire brilliant talent, his team produced it in less than a year. The process is indicative of the way Apple ran. Though Jobs could be overwhelming in pushing his point, he understood that ultimately, his products would not work if their best ideas were discarded. In the case of the iPod, hardware designer Tony Fadell knew how to get his best prototype approved by Jobs — he showed his boss three different designs, with one clearly superior, to give Jobs a chance to berate two efforts before saying, “That’s more like it!” with the last.

Sometimes, Jobs would dig in and only back down when the marketplace spoke. Again, the iPod was an example. Originally, he felt that the iPod should only work with Macintosh’s computers. But its instant popularity led him to agree with some of his employees who had been arguing for a Windows version. When iPod became available to the entire population, it really took off. Apple has sold over 300 million iPods.

“If there was ever a product that catalyzed what’s Apple’s reason for being, it’s this,” Jobs said to me of the iPod, “Because it combines Apple’s incredible technology base with Apple’s legendary ease of use with Apple’s awesome design… it’s like, this is what we do. So if anybody was ever wondering why is Apple on the earth, I would hold this up as a good example.”

What’s more, to support the iPod, Jobs began the iTunes music store, the first successful service to legally sell music over the internet. Though the record labels were notoriously conservative about such deals, “They basically trusted us and we negotiated a landmark deal,” Jobs told me. The iTunes store would sell billions of downloaded songs.

The iPod was a turning point for Apple and Jobs. Competitors never figured out how to top it. Every year, he would come out with a new set. One year he stopped selling the most popular model, the iPod mini, for a totally new model called the Nano. The product line would be laid out on a table. He’d talk about which color he liked best. Often he’d pick one up. Isn’t that amazing?

This satisfied him deeply because Jobs loved music. His heroes were Bob Dylan and the Beatles. I once asked him if his dream was to get Paul McCartney to perform one of those sweet two-song live sets that often close his keynotes. “My dream,” he joked, “is to bring out John Lennon.”

While Jobs reveled in his professional spotlight, he was more circumspect about his private life. He distrusted the most reporters, ever since a 1982 Time article mocked his pretensions and exposed his darker side. Jobs, who thought Time was going to make him Man of the Year (it chose “The Personal Computer” instead) was wounded. “I don’t mind if people don’t like me,” he said in late 1983. “Well, I might a little…but I really mind it when somebody uses their position at Time magazine to tell 10 million people they don’t like me. I know what it’s like to have your private life painted in the worst possible light in front of a lot of people.” Twenty years later, he would still be complaining about that article. (The writer, Michael Mortiz, later became a powerful venture capitalist, funding Yahoo and Google.) But Jobs would not comment on subsequent accounts of his life that detailed not only rude professional behavior but his original refusal to support his first child (later he accepted paternity).

Jobs was a proud, proud father of four children, three from his marriage to Laurene Powell. He was protective of them — whenever he shared a story about one of his children in an interview, he cautioned that the remark was to be off the record. (His widow and all four offspring survive him.) But he clearly took a huge pride in parenthood.

It was July 2004 when Steve Jobs learned he had a rare form of pancreatic cancer. He originally treated the disease without sharing much about it to the public. Critics wondered whether Jobs and Apple had skirted corporate disclosure regulations by not revealing more information. After what seemed to be a successful initial surgery, Jobs would vary from his circumspect stance just once, in his address to the Stanford graduating class of 2005. That speech, by the way, might be the best commencement address in history. When designing computers, Jobs and his team built the one they wanted for themselves. And now he gave a speech that Steve Jobs would have wanted to hear if he had graduated from college.
“No one wants to die, even people who want to go to Heaven don’t want to die to get there,” he told the Stanford graduates. “And yet, death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because death is very likely the single best invention of life. It’s life’s change agent; it clears out the old to make way for the new … Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life.”

Steve Jobs never did that. After his cancer treatment, he took Apple’s biggest risk yet — developing a phone. Of course, it would not be just any mobile phone, but one that combined the media savvy of the iPod, the interface wizardry of the Macintosh, and the design style that had become his trademark.

As with all his products, Jobs was fanatical in monitoring every detail — including the press reaction. I was among the few journalists who got to test it before its release. Soon after I received the unit, I was walking down Broadway and my test unit got a call from “Unknown.” It was Jobs, ostensibly wanting to know what I thought, but actually making sure I understood how amazing it was. I acknowledged that it was extraordinary, but mentioned to him that maybe nothing could match the expectations he had generated. People were calling it the “Jesus phone.” Didn’t that worry him? The answer was no. “We are going to blow away the expectations,” he told me.

The iPhone did just that — especially after Jobs put aside his initial view that only a limited number of developers would be permitted to write applications for it. Apple’s App Store eventually included hundreds of thousands of programs, giving Apple a key advantage. As Apple’s current CEO boasted only Tuesday, the iPhone is the world’s most popular phone.

In 2008, observers noted that Jobs had lost an alarming amount of weight, and looked ill. People wondered whether the cancer had reoccurred. In what looks in retrospect to be misdirection, Apple released a statement calling it a “bug.” When I ran into him in Palo Alto in that time period, Jobs brought up the subject, elaborating in detail about how he was suffering a temporary malady unconnected with this cancer. But he got thinner, and seemed weaker, and took a leave of absence.

Despite his health problems, Jobs kept Apple on a steady pace of innovation. When he returned to Apple — after a liver transplant which was acknowledged only months later — his first appearance was an iPod event. “This is nothing,” he told me after the show. “Wait till you see what’s next.”

He was talking about the iPad, the tablet computer that he introduced in April 2010. Expanding on the touch-based interface of the iPhone, Jobs had pulled off a vision of computing that many (including his rival Microsoft) had been attempting for decades. The iPad instantly established tablet computing as a major category, and as with the iPod, competitors could not match it.

Earlier this year, he took a second medical leave of absence. Tim Cook, the operational wizard who had been appointed Chief Operating Officer, would become the temporary CEO. Jobs would still be involved in product design and strategic direction, but freed of everyday responsibilities.

Jobs came and went to Apple as he was able, driven by a town car to One Infinite Loop in Cupertino, centerpiece of the campus of the company he built, only a few blocks where he had gone to school. He would walk past the receptionist and take the elevator to his fourth-floor suite that included his office, a small staff, and a large boardroom where he had overpowered music executives, raked employees over the coals, and approved products that millions adored. With no daily chores to perform, no crowded appointment book, there could be a strange and tranquil sense of timelessness, even as he helped shape products in progress, and dreamed up new ones.

It seemed Jobs had come to terms with his fate. He would spend time with his family and do what he could at Apple.

In June he gave his last “Stevenote,” talking about iCloud. One could have hoped that he would give many more. But on August 24, he sent a note to Apple’s board that he could not resume the CEO role.

He took the role of executive chair and reported that he would continue to participate in product decisions and strategy. But clearly he was headed towards the end that came today, quietly surrounded by the people who loved him and knowing that many millions of people who never met him would miss him desperately. As he told the Stanford students:

Death is very likely the single best invention of life. It’s life’s change agent; it clears out the old to make way for the new.

The full legacy of Steve Jobs will not be sorted out for a very long time. When employees first talked about Jobs’ “reality distortion field,” it was a pejorative — they were referring to the way that he got you to sign on to a false truth by the force of his conviction and charisma. But at a certain point the view of the world from Steve Jobs’ brain ceased to become distorted. It became an instrument of self-fulfilling prophecy. As product after product emerged from Apple, each one breaking ground and changing our behavior, Steve Job’s reality field actually came into being. And we all live in it.

2010-08-12未分类

没有评论 328 views

告别的时刻

近两年以来,我一直使用Donews的名片。我顽固地把自己当作Donews的人,即使她已经被千橡收购,我从来没有打算换成千橡的名片。并不是我不能接受这样的收购,也不是我不喜欢千橡的名片,仅仅因为,Donews是我的精神寄托。

另外一个原因,Donews给我的自由,我知道大概没有任何其他公司可以给我。我一直相信,自由是惟一值得追求的东西,其他,不过是浮云。同时我也很清楚,自由是一件稀缺的东西,所以它昂贵。

这一年,我游离在所有的漩涡之外,全然不知身处漩涡中的人们,到底在经历着什么。在这个商场如战场的互联网上,我几乎从未被施加过任何我不想承受的压力,但我明白,那些我不想承受的压力,一定有人替我承受了。尽管我从没说过,但我在心底无数次地重复着,谢谢你,刘韧。

像刘韧一样,我也信仰互联网,并且已经信了10年,大概还会继续信下去。像刘韧一样,我也珍爱Donews,并且已经珍爱了6年,大概还会继续珍爱下去。不管将来还能不能继续使用Donews的名片,Donews都是那样一个无法被替代的家园。

我不知道未来,我所知道的是,只要你走,无论走到什么地方,都是未来。关键是,你身边永远都有值得信任的朋友,哪怕你们只是默默地走,一言不发。

对牛乱弹琴

2010-07-28互联网事

没有评论 1,970 views

两极分化的中国互联网

我有两个朋友。

L的公司在上海,大半时间跑广东。他是华南某所不太知名的大学毕业的,小眼睛质朴男,多年以前还是个文学青年。哥们做手机网游的,我见他使过好几款手机,但最贵的一个也不过1千多块钱。比起什么Web2.0、移动互联网的概念,他更关心珠三角的几千万农民工和城市边缘的大学生“蚁族”,怎么关心?在东莞的夜宵摊上跟他们拼啤酒,在富士康厂区外网吧里刷夜,跟靠做他们生意开上宝马的便利店老板扯淡……

W猫在北京中关村。他从小就是个脑袋很大眼睛发亮的天才少年,数理化成绩很好,逻辑思维超强,英文和中文一般流利。在首都某著名大学毕业后,W 直接去美国名校拿了硕士,接着回国创业。我一直觉得,他是硅谷Geek们的中国版。诸如iPad之类的新技术玩意,我总能第一时间从他那儿找到。他也是国内把玩Facebook、Twitter、Groupon、Foursqure的人。啥叫互联网的未来,W做的网站就代表互联网的未来。

W比L拥有更多的掌声和名声。但遗憾的是,他做了好几个连投资人都觉得很酷的网站,却始终没有挣到大钱。原因不外如下:要么是起个大早,却被一大堆抄近道的同行给围追堵截;要么因为资金接济不上,只能让一个更有资源实力的大公司直接吃掉,还有的不知道触了哪根高压线被主管部门直接暂停。

继续阅读 »

2010-07-11互联网事

没有评论 326 views

Nokia:把触摸屏放进每一个口袋

如果可以让一切走向简单

静静的走在街头,一边用 N86 给朋友发着短信聊着这个话题,一边怀念着被友人带回中国把玩的 N900。原因很简单,我只是无比的想念 N900 上面精彩绝伦的统一收件箱。从来没有想过这么一个看似简单朴实的功能会让我如此痴迷,但如果你真的好好的试用过,恐怕也会为之拍案叫绝。

这是一个傍晚,澳洲的夕阳总是很美,橘色里透着一点血红,不过这样的美景不会长久,日薄西山,也许是最好的注解。巧合的发完短信抬起头,一个手持 iPhone 的路人从旁走过,我不禁感慨,Nokia 是否也如同这晚霞,真的日薄西山?

02212008021_thumb[1]

Symbian 是太臃肿了么?Nokia 是太古板而不思进取了么?iPhone 和 Android 是真的那么先进么?从此手机就是多点触摸的天下了么?我不断的问自己

继续阅读 »

关于互联网:你必须知道的一切

《关于互联网:你必须知道的一切》,这一篇文章从思想的层面了解互联网,极为深刻,值得一读。尽管互联网给了我们所有的答案,充分 发挥其潜力,改变了我们的生活,但仍然是很大的未知数。以下是九个关键问题,探讨了解我们这个时代 最强大的工具——以及它会带我们走向何方。

互联网和万维网不是一回事:互联网类似于轨道和铁路等基础设施,而万维网则是运行于其上的部分交通。 图片来源:China Photos

在我们走向未来的路上发生了有意思的事情。互联网正从外来的事物变成平淡的公用设施,像如电力或自来水一样,而我们从来没有真正意识到。并且,正慢慢地依 赖这个我们一直漠不关心的系统。你会以为我说依赖是过于夸张?嗯,你问一下爱沙尼亚,这个星球上最依赖互联网的国家之一,2007年其网络基础设施受到持 续袭击而关闭了多多少少也有两个星期。或者你可以想象一下它会是什么,如果有一天,你突然发现无法预订航班,无法从银行帐户转帐,无法查询巴士时间表,无 法发送电子邮件,无法搜索谷歌,无法     使用Skype给家里打电话,无法从苹果公司购买音乐或从Amazon购买书籍,无法在eBay上买卖东西,无法在YouTube看影片,无法在 iPlayer上看BBC节目,还有其他像呼吸一样自然的1001件事情。

互联网已经悄悄地渗透了我们的生活,但我们似乎对此非常不在意的。这并不是因为我们缺乏关于互联网的信息,相反,我们正在泛滥这些东西。只是我们不知道这 一切意味着什么。我们正陷于某种状态,用著名的信息学者曼努埃尔.卡斯特的描述来说,叫做“知情困惑”。

继续阅读 »

2010-06-28互联网事

没有评论 316 views

不可战胜的Apple:全球最酷企业十大经验

导读:即将于7月1日出版的第147期美国《Fast Company》杂志将刊登科技专栏作家法哈德·曼约奥(Farhad Manjoo)的文章,对苹果的成功秘诀进行全面总结。

以下为文章概要:

2010年5月26日星期三,刚过下午两点半,一件不可思议的事情发生了:苹果变成了科技行业最大的企业,成为市值仅次于埃克森美孚的全美第二 大上市公司。几个月来,苹果的市值一直都徘徊在微软之下。此前,恰恰是微软将苹果逼至绝境,并于1997年以1.5亿美元的投资将苹果从死亡线上救了回 来。而如今,微软却与谷歌、亚马逊、宏达电、诺基亚和惠普等公司一道成为苹果决心铲除的对象。这家一度被人轻视的企业,如今却成为全球最大的音乐公司,而 且很快也将统治电子书市场。接下来是什么?农业?牙刷?还是改革航空业?

目前看来,这些事情苹果似乎都能做,而且还不止于此。这家公司过去几年经历了火箭发射般的增长,它的一系列紧凑而迅速的爆发不仅让所有人感到震 惊,也给人们带来了快乐。整个事情发生得那么快,但又那么理所当然,以至于我们几乎没有什么机会理解我们所看到的一切。

苹果公司、苹果的领导者以及苹果的产品都已经成为了通用的文化符号。戴尔希望成为企业界的苹果;Zipcar希望成为汽车分享领域的苹果。医疗 保健和清洁能源等行业也都在寻找他们自己的史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs),而喜剧演员比尔·马赫(Bill Maher)甚至表示,如果让乔布斯当总统,美国政府会干得更好。但正在对苹果展开调查的美国司法部和美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)或许不会认同这一观 点。而iTunes也被用于体育界,专指那些在某位球员辉煌时期将其引入,而不是终身买断这名球员的行为。

这种简短的称谓的确有用,但是却会鼓励对苹果的盲目模仿。苹果并没有公布过该公司关键的成功因素。与产品相比,这些成功准则的保密措施更为到 位。乔布斯并没有对此发表评论。他少有的几次公开言论都是在一些精心安排的环境(比如MacWorld大展,或者在新品发布时期的接受某些杂志的专访)中 发表的,或者是在深夜通过邮件发表的辩解性言论。但每每谈及如何领导他的公司成为全美甚至全球模范企业时,他总是保持沉默。

继续阅读 »

王建硕:Facebook的片段

表面看,这只是又一个好运的互联网新秀。但越仔细了解这家公司,你会越觉得他们的成功是有计划出来的,而非巧合—也许这才是Facebook最牛的 地方。

2月的湾区阳光灿烂,美国280州际公路两边的绿色山坡,蔚蓝天空和飘逸的白云,让人觉得自己是 Windows XP桌面上的一个图标。下午,2点,终于来到Facebook这个神奇的公司。在他们的新家,Matt向我介绍一个人。他坐在5张桌子拼成的岛的里面一张 桌子上,远离光线好的窗户,身后是一个人来人往的会议室。我们握手,然后我看他很眼熟,然后想了半天,总算觉得好像是……“Are you that Mark?”他说是呀。他就是Facebook的Mark Zuckerberg,创始人和CEO。这个比我还小7岁的年轻人,非常的腼腆,低调,不善言辞,就好像一个新来的还有些拘谨的实习生。

继续阅读 »

乔布斯的过去与未来

《乔布斯复出记》(The Second Coming of Steve Jobs)是由 Alan Deutschman 撰写的乔布斯传记。本文摘选了其中部分章节,主要讲述了重出江湖的乔布斯是如何改造苹果的 —— 从「不同凡想」的广告计划到「言多必失」的恐怖统治。

文/Alan Deutschman    英文

一九九七年九月十六日,史蒂夫·乔布斯宣布自己将出任苹果的「临时 CEO」。他搬进了一间明显偏小的办公室,紧挨着董事会议室。他留下了吉尔·阿梅里奥之前的秘书维琦并告诉她自己不喜欢公司现有的办公用笔。他只愿意用日 本百乐(Pilot)生产的某种笔 —— 据他说那是「最好」的笔。

他喜欢穿着黑衫和短裤在公司园区附近赤脚行走。有一天他同吉姆·奥利弗搭起了讪。吉姆是沃顿商学院毕业的博士,吉尔从前的助手。

继续阅读 »

Google wave背后的思考

By Chris Foresman from arstechnica.com | Echokou译

一年前的 5 月 28 日,Google 高调推出了 Wave 协作工具。一开始 Wave 只对少数开发者开放,到秋季的时候将 beta 版开放给了更多人。当时几乎每个关注科技的人都在或求或发 Wave 邀请——人人都想试一下。有限的邀请数量引发了 Wave 浪潮,但这波浪潮在每个人都拿到邀请后消失了:很多用户想知道,“Wave 是用来干什么的”?

上个月在 Wave 一周年之际,Google 将 Wave 完全开放,但要想成为用户首选,成为超过电子邮件、IM 等沟通工具,Wave 仍然前路漫漫。本文是对 Wave 开发人员 Rasmussen 的访问,讨论了 Wave 应该扮演什么角色,未来的发展方向又如何。

继续阅读 »

2010-06-20创业基因

没有评论 355 views

为什么硅谷最牛的人在创业公司?

上次写到《中国的硅谷在哪里?》,《中国企业家》的主编李岷女士约稿,希望继续写一些关于硅谷和中国的差异。我欣然从命,找了一个和硅谷 类似的风景秀丽的地方(我家阳台),看着满眼的绿树,开始思考一直困扰着我的一个问题:为什么硅谷最牛的人都在创业公司,而国内大公司对于人才的吸引力依 然如旧。

最好的技术人员在创业公司的现象

在国内,大的技术公司,尤其是跨国公司,对于技术人员是有很强的吸引力,至少在我毕业的九十年代是这样。一张微软或者IBM的聘书,远好过小作坊里 风雨中飘摇的创业公司。

而在硅谷,却不是这样。Google,eBay,PayPal,YouTube,Yahoo!等吸引最多牛人的时刻,是他们创业时期,或者说上市前 的时期,而不是之后。PayPal是一个典型的创业公司。当PalPay变大的时候,大家纷纷离开PayPal,创建了YouTube(Steve Chen),LinkedIn(Reid Hoffman),Slide.com(Max),Facebook(Roelof投资),Geni(David Sacks),Yelp(Yelp)。。。

我们现在探究这种现象的原因。

惊人的回报

在硅谷做小公司,如果有一天能做大上市,产生的财富是天文数字,这个已经成为共识,不再多说。

最近我发现另外一个以前没有留意的现象,更值得回味。我请教一位资深人士一个问题:在硅谷公司的并购如何进行的。我得到的答案令我非常吃惊。他提 到:如果一家大公司看中了一个技术型的小公司,假设这个公司除了几个优秀的人以外并没有什么资产的话,大概的价格将会是按照每个技术人员两百万到三百万美 元的价格支付。也就是说,对于一个4-5个人的公司,在一千万美元左右。当然,这并不全是现金,而是以一部分现金,一部分股票来支付。前不久 Facebok以5千万美金收购FriendFeed,其实就是看中了Bret Taylor等几个技术人员,当并购发生的时候,整个团队还仅仅10个人。这是一个以买人为主的交易。

如果从一个很牛的技术人员的角度来看,应聘一个职位得到的回报就算再多,也不及被收购,更不要说上市的回报。这个数量级上面的差异,足够诱惑大量的 真正有创业家精神的牛人。

继续阅读 »


返回顶部